|
|
The
Drawing Center Awaits Its Future
By Etta Sanders
George Negroponte, president of the Soho-based Drawing Center, is a man
in limbo.
Tossed from the heights of glory to the depths of disappointment following
Gov. George Pataki's about-face on the appropriateness of the Drawing Center
for the World Trade Center site, Negroponte was still awaiting word late
last month on the fate of his museum's dream.
|
|
 |
In his most extensive interview since the museum rejected Pataki's
controversial demand in June for a promise to show art that does
not disparage the United States, Negroponte, spoke to the Trib about
how the museum's coveted spot in the heart of the site may have
turned into a place on the sidelines.

The apparent removal of the Drawing Center from the World Trade
Center site upends two years of planning and comes on the heels
of other well-publicized glitches in the rebuilding effort.
"I'm not sure anyone would look back on the last two or three
years when it comes to this project and call it a success so far,"
said Negroponte, who lives on Hubert Street with his wife and their
two sons. "I think the only thing that is going to change that
perception is the outcome."
|
|
Pataki had lauded the Drawing Center and the three other
cultural institutions chosen for the site-the International
Freedom Center, the Joyce Theater and the Signature Theater
Company-when their selection was announced to great fanfare
at the Winter Garden in June of last year. They will "reaffirm
life in the wake of tragedy," Pataki said then.
That giddy optimism began fading fast this spring following
an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal by Debra Burlingame,
whose brother was the pilot of the plane that terrorists crashed
into the Pentagon. The Drawing Center and the Freedom Center,
a new institution that was to occupy most of the new cultural
complex, did not belong near the World Trade Center memorial,
she wrote. What followed was a barrage of similar criticism
from other 9/11 victims' relatives. In June, the Daily News
examined the catalogues of past Drawing Center exhibits and
found images of Abu Ghraib and other drawings perceived as
"anti-American."
In no time, the News got action. "Nutty 9/11 Art Nixed,"
its June 24 front page proclaimed. Pataki called for an "absolute
guarantee" that the museum's exhibits would not "denigrate
America." (Ironically, Negroponte's brother, John Negroponte,
is director of national intelligence, a post he took after
serving as President Bush's ambassador to Iraq during the
war.)
On Aug. 11, John Whitehead, chairman of the Lower Manhattan
Development Corporation, announced that the Drawing Center
and the LMDC
|
 |
|
"have been exploring alternative sites Downtown." The Freedom
Center, which continues to be the focus of attacks by some family
groups, was asked to submit "its specific plans, program and
governance structure" by Sept. 23. If those plans are rejected,
Whitehead said, a new tenant "consistent with our objectives"
will be found for the cultural complex.
While Whitehead cited consensus of the LMDC board, the city
expressed displeasure with the recent decisions. "To
reach this conclusion without a significant amount
of
debate and public comment leading up to the debate is disappointing,"
said Deputy Mayor Daniel Doctoroff.
The Drawing Center quickly made it clear that it would not succumb
to censorship. "We basically said there is nothing we would
change," Negroponte said.
The barrage caught the Drawing Center by surprise.
"If the Daily News had come into the Drawing Center and
demanded that we take a piece off the wall, it would have been
much simpler," Negroponte said. "What made it more
complicated was that we were being questioned about plans for
what we might show five years from now." |
 |
|
Additionally, he said, in the museum's 28-year history it has shown
little art with a political slant.
The Drawing Center, a small museum with a $1.7 million annual budget,
submitted its long-shot application for a place on the site along
with 130 other cultural organizations in June 2003.
Negroponte and the museum's executive director, Catherine de Zegher,
spent hundreds of hours in discussions with the LMDC, explaining their
vision for making the 28-year-old museum a part of Downtown's revitalization.
When they were selected a year later, they worked closely with the
cultural complex's architects to customdesign a space, and in a matter
of months put together a business plan of several hundred pages to
demonstrate the financial and administrative viability of their plan.
Throughout the meetings and intense scrutiny, one question was not
raised, according to Negroponte. "We never really discussed content
with the LMDC," he said.
The cultural center, designed by the architectural firm Snohetta,
was unveiled on May 19. The wood-andglass building would be elevated
above the ground, allowing for passage beneath it as a kind of gateway
to the memorial. It would hover just 25 feet from the north tower's
footprint. Organizations of victims' families protested that it was
too close. Having museums with content unrelated to the events of
9/11 and the remembrance of their loved ones adjacent to the memorial
could be confusing and offensive, they said. (The building's size
has since been reduced by 30 percent and moved farther from the memorial).
The issue was not censorship, they said, but that the quadrant earmarked
for the memorial should be only for the memorial.
"We're not against culture. We're not against the redevelopment
of Lower Manhattan," said Patricia Reilly, whose sister died
at the World Trade Center. "But not on the small site they set
aside for the memorial. It's not like they can't put it somewhere
else."
In its effort to press the point, a coalition of 9/11 family groups
(www.- takebackthememorial.org) plans to demonstrate near the site
on Sept. 10.
Negroponte believes that misunderstandings about architect Daniel
Libeskind's master plan fueled the controversy. A building dedicated
to art and ideas was intended to bring life to the redevelopment,
as well as to act as a buffer between the memorial and the commercial
bustle of the transit station and office space to the east, he said.
"It's a little confusing to some because they are not civic planners,
they are not architects, nor are they very visually inclined."
Money also played a role in the LMDC's backtracking. Family member
groups threatened to boycott fundraising for the memorial. Whitehead
worried publicly at an LMDC board meeting in July about the potential
harm to fund-raising efforts by the two museums.
Negroponte also said that a relentless focus on the rebuilding schedule
may have prevented more discussions between the cultural institutions
and the family members. "For months and months we were led to
believe that schedule was all that mattered," he said.
The preoccupation with problems has been difficult for Negroponte
and his family, he said. Fortunately for the 52-year-old painter,
he could escape to his other life, as a working artist. (An exhibit
of his paintings opens this month at the Jason McCoy gallery on 57th
Street.) He said his artistic viewpoint also helps him keep perspective.
"Artists can kind of appreciate a mess. I'm not sure politicians
can."
Officially, the Drawing Center has yet to be removed from the Snohetta
building, according to Negroponte, but the museum is actively looking
at alternative sites. One possible location is a triangle of open
space alongside 7 World Trade Center. An LMDC spokesman did not respond
to requests for comment.
Anita Contini, a former LMDC executive who was in charge of the selection
process for the cultural institutions and memorial design, said it
would be a loss to the community if the Drawing Center does not find
a home Downtown.
"The Drawing Center has a long history of presenting extraordinary
exhibitions and has important and loved educational programs for children,"
she said. "It's a gem of an institution."
As discussions continued with the LMDC about the Drawing Center's
fate, Negroponte expressed both sadness and hope.
"After 9/11 I thought we were all part of some extraordinary
rebuilding effort that was going to serve as an example of how we
could collectively do something fantastic. It's been a big disappointment,"
he said. "Strangely, I feel pretty optimistic. I still have this
feeling there is a way to address all the issues and say everyone
is right- everybody can be part of the solution."
|
|